Logo horizontal ruler

  Archive

About Us Contact

Parking Reduction Idea Falls Flat

By Anita Varghese
Staff Writer

September 7 -- An idea by Planning Commissioner Terry O’Day to reduce parking requirements and decouple parking from rental rates in Santa Monica’s transit districts, particularly Downtown, drew the ire of other commissioners and residents Wednesday.

O’Day wanted the commission to send a possible recommendation to the City Council, but commissioners instead asked staff to examine how parking is used Downtown – its availability and distribution – when Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE) discussions are held.

Decoupling allows housing developers to build fewer parking spaces than required by ordinance in exchange for lowering the rent of residents who forego a parking space.

The idea also includes allowing businesses and retailers to operate with fewer parking spaces than required for customers and employees.

“We are looking at parking as a key feature of the city, one that affects the design and function of the neighborhoods, in particular the cost of housing and services,” said O’Day, who is the commission’s vice chair.

“Anyone who has been in the city for any period of time knows there has been a considerable amount of new construction of housing and parking in the Downtown area and the transit corridors.”

He said public benefits such as already built but little-used parking structures and mass transit are lost when business owners or housing developers are required to establish a certain number of parking spaces for their own buildings, which adds to the cost of consumer goods or housing units.

“I was thinking about what the cost of parking is and what it means when we build communities for cars rather than for people,” O’Day said.

Chair Gwynne Pugh said the Commission needs more information and solid data to fully understand the wide-ranging scope of the issue.

People may not need lots of parking options if they live in or near Downtown, but residents north of Montana Avenue would obviously be driving to their destinations and need parking spaces, Pugh said.

Commissioner Julia Lopez Dad reminded her colleagues they would need to have a thorough discussion with the Rent Control Board because, under a City Charter amendment, parking spaces and other amenities found in a housing complex affect rent control.

Commissioner Gleam Davis said she has never seen reliable data to support O’Day’s claim that more people would use mass transit if fewer parking spaces are available.

Drivers would just go around the blocks several times looking for an elusive parking space.

She said East Coast cities such as New York, Boston and Washington, D.C. are able to limit the availability of parking because they have elaborate transportation networks that combine subways, elevated trains and trolleys.

In Santa Monica, Davis said residents will still own cars to go places such as Hollywood or Downtown Los Angeles because they don’t want to spend hours on a bus to get there.

Residents who spoke at the commission meeting Wednesday believe most people will not want to give up their parking spaces even if they don’t use a car every day, because they would still need a space to park their cars when not in use.

Speakers also agreed that mass transit in Santa Monica is not adequately routed around major job centers, and many residents prefer driving short distances to retail and service locations, especially women out on errands after dark.

“This is not only a bad idea, but a terrible idea,” said Jeanne Dodson, chair of the Wilshire Montana Neighborhood Coalition.

“The concept that renters don’t deserve a place to park their cars is really upsetting and insulting. Who on this Commission is willing to give up their parking spaces?”

Dodson knows environmentalists who frequently ride their bicycles or the Big Blue Bus, but they still own cars because of the expansive layout of Santa Monica and Southern California.

“We could likely get ourselves into a worse parking situation than what we have now if we don’t allow enough parking in residential buildings,” warned Lopez Dad.

“There will often be shared living arrangements among adults given the high rents in Santa Monica for multi-bedroom units, with each adult possibly having his or her own car.”

O’Day said his intention is not to take away necessary residential parking spaces, but an attempt to capitalize on potential mass transit opportunities near specific Downtown sites.

Readers Fine Jewelers Advertisement

 

“I was thinking about what the cost of parking is and what it means when we build communities for cars rather than for people.” Terry O’Day

 

“This is not only a bad idea, but a terrible idea.” Jeanne Dodson

 

“We could likely get ourselves into a worse parking situation than what we have now if we don’t allow enough parking in residential buildings.” Julie Lopez Dad

 

Lookout Logo footer image
Copyright 1999-2008 surfsantamonica.com. All Rights Reserved.
Footer Email icon