By Olin
Ericksen
Staff Writer
December 1 -- With thousands of Westside parents already
paying the equivalent of a car loan for day care, Santa Monica
vaulted over other California cities Tuesday when the City Council
imposed the highest building fees in the state to fund new child
service facilities.
While some council members suggest the fees are too high -- 300
to 500 percent more than any other city for developments over
7,500 square feet -- most said the high rates are a necessary
step to curb the dramatically rising cost of daycare.
"It comes down to are we serious about getting child care
facilities or not," said Council member Ken Genser, who was
on the council in 1990 when the first child care master plan was
adopted by the City.
Patti Oblath, co-chair of the Child Care and Early Education
Task Force, said the law -- which standardizes fees now negotiated
with individual developers -- is a watershed for families.
"We applaud this huge step," said Oblath, who, with
others on the task force formed in 1980, lobbied nearly six years
to standardize the fees. "We're delighted it is before you
here tonight."
Under the law, developers of office buildings larger than 7,500
square feet would pay the most -- $5.27 per square foot –
with the money used to offset the impact of new development on
childcare.
Developers of large retail spaces that exceed that density threshold
would pay $3.77 per square foot, while hotels can expect to pay
$2.64, under the ordinance.
There was some debate over whether to impose the fee for residential
projects at a time when the City is struggling with escalating
rents and a dearth of affordable housing.
In the end, the council voted to impose a flat fee of $111 per
unit, except for those that are affordable, a move that was not
recommended by the City-endorsed Child Care and Early Education
Task Force.
Mayor Bob Holbrook, who abstained from the 5 to 0 vote, unsuccessfully
argued that affordable housing developers, such as Community Corporation,
should share the burden.
For members of the task force -- who have lobbied for a childcare
facility or fees in nine major development agreements, including
those for Saint John’s Health Center and the Water Garden
office complex -- the move means no more negotiating.
Although many at the meeting hailed the vote, Holbrook and Council
member Bobby Shriver worried that the development fees -- based
on a 2005 study -- may be too high.
"I'm a complete supporter of childcare… at the same
the fact that we are 500 percent higher is a pretty aggressive
posture," said Shriver, who ultimately supported the measure.
"It's a big number."
Fears that high fees could dampen development was a primary reason
some cities had kept their rates closer to $1 per square foot,
staff acknowledged.
"There are concerns (in other cities) that the fees could
become a hindrance to development," said Andy Agle, the Planning
Department’s assistant director.
Supporters hope the measure -- which awaits final approval on second
reading next week -- will serve as model for other California cities,
including San Francisco, which are currently in the process of updating
their fees, according to staff. |