|The Lookout Letter to the editor|
|Speak Out!||Send Letters to firstname.lastname@example.org|
November 16, 2020
Several significant issues are suggested by the possibilities discussed in the creative and balanced article in the Lookout ("New Council Could Have Votes to End Voting Rights Lawsuit," November 12, 2020).
The victory of three slate members puts their theory to rest, so the incumbents, and McCowan, may now favor district elections.
As to the slate victors, there are issues. Oscar and Christine both live in the Pico Neighborhood. In district elections, only one can be elected. Kristin also lives there. She moved a year ago from outside Santa Monica to live at the home of her parents, so perhaps another move would not be much of a problem. Just speculation.
Maria Loya, who is de la Torre's wife, is one of two plaintiffs in the pending litigation, but would benefit only as a member of the citywide public in a settlement. Until recently, de la Torre was co chair of the other plaintiff, the Pico Neighborhood Association (PNA). Perhaps he should obtain a conflicts opinion from an independent expert as well as the City Attorney.
As to Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, the current fees have been estimated to total about $20 million. The new Council should make an exhaustive review of those billings to see if Interim City Managr Lane Dilg and Interim City Attorney George Cardona have protected the City in monitoring those billings.
On one complicated motion alone, the Judge ruled against the City simply because Gibson had screwed up in fixing the hearing date. At up to $1,500 per hour, and using five lawyers on that brief, Gibson deserves not one penny.
|Copyright 1999-2020 surfsantamonica.com. All Rights Reserved.|